The effect of columns moment of inertia
In the onebay frame of the following figure, the second column is considered having eight times higher moment of inertia than the first one. Both columns behave as fixedended, due to the infinite moment of inertia of the crossbar.
Figure 5.1.31: 89% and 11% of the seismic action are carried by the strong column (800/400) and the weak column (400/400) respectively Figure 5.1.31: 89% and 11% of the seismic action are carried by the strong column (800/400) and the weak column (400/400) respectively
i.e. 89% of the seismic shear is carried by the second column!
Example 5.1.3 Consider that the first column is the one of the previous example with crosssection 400/400 and that the second one differs only regarding one of its sides (800 mm instead of 400 mm with Ι _{800/400} =8 Ι _{400/400} ). The seismic acceleration factor of a / g =0.10.
H= 2·(0.10·800kN)= 160 kN
V_{a}=160 ·1 /9=17.8 kN, V_{b}=160·8/9=142.2 kN
M_{a1}=M_{a2}=17.8·3.0/2=26.7 kNm, M_{b1}=M_{b2}=142.2·3.0/2=213.3 kNm
K_{a}=12EI/h^{3}= 31.10·10^{6} N/m and K_{b}=12E · 8I/h^{3}=8· 31.10·10^{6}N/m =248.8 · 10^{6} N/m
Σ( K )=279.9 · 10^{6} N / m
δ= H /Σ( K )=(160·10^{3} N )/(279.9 · 10^{6} N / m )=0.572 mm
In project <B_513> of the related software, the crosssections of columns C1, C2 are 400/400 and 800/400 respectively and their height is equal to 3.0 m. The flanged beam has crosssection 250/500/1010/150 and span 5.0 m.
Figure 5.1.32: The structural frame model without rigid bodies but fully stiffened Figure 5.1.32: The structural frame model without rigid bodies but fully stiffened
The parameter values required for the relevant modelling are as follows:
Figure 5.1.33 Figure 5.1.33

Figure 5.1.34 Figure 5.1.34

Figure 5.1.35: Elastic line, δ_{max}=1.366 mm Figure 5.1.35: Elastic line, δ_{max}=1.366 mm

Figure 5.1.36: Shear force diagrams Figure 5.1.36: Shear force diagrams

Figure 5.1.37: Bending moment diagrams Figure 5.1.37: Bending moment diagrams

Figure 5.1.38: Axial force diagrams Figure 5.1.38: Axial force diagrams

Modelling of the example with elastic degree of fixity on columns
The results are displayed using the following button sequence: "Analysis Results", "Combined"=OFF, "Combination definition" ["Delete all", "Ex"=1.0, "OK"], "Shears" ("Moments", etc.), "Show values"=ON. For more detailed results: "Printing", "Earthquake Resistant Results", "Analytical".
It should be noted that the actual displacement δ=1.366 mm of the crossbar is higher than the theoretical value δ =0.572 mm derived under the assumption of fixed end conditions. This is mainly due to the strong column and the significantly smaller stiffness of the normal beam.
The actual stiffness of C1 is K_{a}=V_{a}/δ=(36.1·10^{3}N/0.00136633m)=26.42·10^{6} kN/m (against 31.10·10^{6} N/m of the fixedended column, therefore there is a relatively small difference).
The actual stiffness of C2 is K_{b}=V_{b}/δ=(123.9·10^{3}N/0.00136633m)=90.68·10^{6} kN/m (against 248.8·10^{6} N/m of the fixedended column, therefore there is a significant difference).
The behaviour of the strong column, as shown from its elastic line, approaches more the behaviour of the oneendfixed column (stiffness 62.2· 10^{6} N/m), than the fixedended one (stiffness248.8·10^{6} N/m).
If the shear effect is taken into account (at the 'Stiffness Parameters' dialogue select Shear effect=ON), the displacement developed equals to δ=1.444 mm (against δ=1.366, therefore the effect is small).